<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jose LOOGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proballnw.com/03-2009/jose-loogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proballnw.com/03-2009/jose-loogy/</link>
	<description>a Seattle Mariners blog formerly known as Bleeding Blue and Teal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.proballnw.com/03-2009/jose-loogy/comment-page-1/#comment-5395</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingblueandteal.com/?p=1536#comment-5395</guid>
		<description>Lugo looked pretty good out there the few times I saw him.  He seemed to have pretty good velocity on this FG (no radar at ST stadiums).  I like what I&#039;ve seen from the kid so far.

He hasn&#039;t played above &quot;A&quot; level?  I wasn&#039;t aware of that.

Lonnie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lugo looked pretty good out there the few times I saw him.  He seemed to have pretty good velocity on this FG (no radar at ST stadiums).  I like what I&#8217;ve seen from the kid so far.</p>
<p>He hasn&#8217;t played above &#8220;A&#8221; level?  I wasn&#8217;t aware of that.</p>
<p>Lonnie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Shields</title>
		<link>http://www.proballnw.com/03-2009/jose-loogy/comment-page-1/#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingblueandteal.com/?p=1536#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://chrisoleary.com/projects/Baseball/Pitching/RethinkingPitching/Essays/DeathToTheInvertedW.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chris O&#039;Leary&#039;s essay on the &quot;Inverted W&quot;&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;a pitching arm action cue that is referred to as the &quot;Inverted W&quot; (or the &quot;Upside-Down W&quot;, &quot;M&quot;, &quot;Winged Arm Action&quot; or &quot;Breaking the hands with the elbows&quot;).
...
Many people think I coined the term &quot;Inverted W&quot; and criticize me as a result for not using the much simpler term &quot;M&quot;. This is a perfectly valid criticism. However, the truth is that I did not coin the term the &quot;Inverted W&quot;. Instead, I believe the term &quot;Inverted W&quot; was coined by Paul Nyman.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Call if what you like.  I like &quot;Inverted W&quot; because it implies &quot;the opposite of W&quot;.  Since forming a &quot;W&quot; is the right thing to do, the term &quot;Inverted W&quot; would be clearly incorrect... at least in my mind.  That&#039;s why I prefer that term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://chrisoleary.com/projects/Baseball/Pitching/RethinkingPitching/Essays/DeathToTheInvertedW.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/chrisoleary.com/projects/Baseball/Pitching/RethinkingPitching/Essays/DeathToTheInvertedW.html?referer=');">Chris O&#8217;Leary&#8217;s essay on the &#8220;Inverted W&#8221;</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>a pitching arm action cue that is referred to as the &#8220;Inverted W&#8221; (or the &#8220;Upside-Down W&#8221;, &#8220;M&#8221;, &#8220;Winged Arm Action&#8221; or &#8220;Breaking the hands with the elbows&#8221;).<br />
&#8230;<br />
Many people think I coined the term &#8220;Inverted W&#8221; and criticize me as a result for not using the much simpler term &#8220;M&#8221;. This is a perfectly valid criticism. However, the truth is that I did not coin the term the &#8220;Inverted W&#8221;. Instead, I believe the term &#8220;Inverted W&#8221; was coined by Paul Nyman.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Call if what you like.  I like &#8220;Inverted W&#8221; because it implies &#8220;the opposite of W&#8221;.  Since forming a &#8220;W&#8221; is the right thing to do, the term &#8220;Inverted W&#8221; would be clearly incorrect&#8230; at least in my mind.  That&#8217;s why I prefer that term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elkboy3</title>
		<link>http://www.proballnw.com/03-2009/jose-loogy/comment-page-1/#comment-5393</link>
		<dc:creator>elkboy3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingblueandteal.com/?p=1536#comment-5393</guid>
		<description>Just out of curiosity...is there a reason to call it an &quot;Inverted W&quot; instead of just an &quot;M&quot;?

I&#039;m only half kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out of curiosity&#8230;is there a reason to call it an &#8220;Inverted W&#8221; instead of just an &#8220;M&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only half kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
