Cliff Lee’s Trade Value
by Jon Shields ~ June 14th, 2010 at 9:34 am
GM Jack Zduriencik has to be close to raising the white flag. The Mariners sit 11 games back and do not look like a team that can Colorado Rockies their way back into the playoff picture. They look a lot more like a team that will be competing for the first overall pick of next June’s draft. Soon it will be time for Zduriencik to start auctioning off what he can in an attempt to bring in some reinforcements for next year and beyond. He doesn’t have a lot to work with, but one of his few trade chips is a pretty big one in ace Cliff Lee.
What is Lee’s trade value? Today’s article from Yahoo’s Jeff Passan says just about everything I originally had in this post in far fewer words, so I defer to him:
It’s that time of year, and the only thing holding back …
1. Cliff Lee from extracting a king’s ransom is the plethora of other pitchers available at this deadline derby. None is quite like Lee, of course, and those in his neighborhood make more than his $9 million salary. In other words, he is the perfect mercenary: cheap (relatively), attached to two draft picks (for sure), playoff proven (check out last year) and unfazed by anything (remember this?) .
and
“I don’t care how much [GM Jack Zduriencik] likes draft picks,” one executive said this week. “They cost money to sign, and he can get established players through a trade.”
At least two top-level prospects, the executive suggested, along with a couple more low-level dreamers.
The other day I wrote about a scenario in which the draft picks made sense, but concluded that a trade for near-MLB ready impact prospects would be much better and, while the market hasn’t revealed the buyers just yet, should be there. The executive’s assessment of what Seattle could get is about in line what I was planning to write here, although a little stronger. I was going to suggest one near-MLB ready blue chipper (say, an MLB top 50 prospect), another near-MLB “B” prospect (Mariner equivalent might be Matt Tuiasosopo or Ezequiel Carrera; Michael Saunders if you’re lucky), and two or three toolsy A-ballers that may or not make it (think Joherymn Chavez, acquired in the Brandon Morrow trade).
For discussion:
1.) As a Mariner fan, would you rather see Seattle go on a run and stay relatively close to the division lead in order to keep the ballgames interesting (despite playoff odds hovering under 1%), or would you rather see the team continue to sink so that there is no hesitation in trading a guy like Lee or David Aardsma and to ensure a better first round draft pick for next year?
2.) Open rosterbation thread. Let’s hear more of you (well thought out) Cliff Lee offers.
